Page 15 - Valentino Cattelan - Credere is credit and creed: trust, money, and religion in western and islamic finance
P. 15

IANUS n. 29-2024                       ISSN 1974-9805





               German Society for Sociology, serving as a member of its first executive body.
                  While  it  is  difficult  to  judge  how  much  Simmel’s  personal  contacts  with
               Tönnies and Weber influenced his scholarship, one can elaborate on the role of
               Christian religion – through the acknowledgement of the absolute, infinite, value
               of the human being (as dispersed in finite credit relations though money) – in the
               conceptualization  of  his  Philosophy  of  money  (1900).  Better,  within  Simmel’s
               Lebensphilosophie, it is not religion but religiosity, as an existential and social form,
               the  basic  form  in  which  the  «entire  existence  [Dasein]  expresses  itself  in  a
                                 46
               particular tonality»  to explain his understanding of money as incorporating any
               value (i.e. anything potentially object of reciprocal trust) as «pure energy», «pure
               relation» .
                       47
                  In  fact,  Simmel  pays  particular  attention  to  the  two  basic  social  forms  of
               religiosity, and namely: (1) belief or social trust, and (2) the experience of social
               unity.
                  (1)  As already argued in this article, credere (‘to believe’, ‘to trust’ in the Latin
               language) belongs to the essence of money as well as of religion: believing in
               somebody means giving them personal/economic credit, which reflects the trust
               that they will return what has been lent; to believe in God corresponds to the faith
               in afterlife salvation. «In social relations, we time and again believe in the validity
               of someone’s judgment or in another person’s sincerity… This belief implies that
               one relies on someone without further questions, convincing reasons or proofs of
               evidence» .
                        48
                  (2)  At the same time, this finite bond in social relations necessarily lies in the
               experience of social unity, through an «ambivalent feeling of belonging and not–
                         49
               belonging» , where each single «story of (personal) credit» and risk melts in a
               spiritual «story of infinite faith» in the social unity to which one belongs, and then
               hope that is also expressed in the spirituality of religion. «The individual feels
               connected to something general, higher, from which he flees and in which he
                                                                               50
               flees, […] from which he differs and that yet he is also identical with» .


                  46   SIMMEL,  Gesammelte  Schriften  zur  Religionssoziologie,  Berlin,  1989  (originally  published  in
               1906/1912), 113, as quoted by LAERMANS, The ambivalence of religiosity and religion: a reading of Georg
               Simmel, in Social Compass, 53 (4), 2006, 482.
                  47   Although  Simmel’s  writings  on  religion  and  religiosity  cover  only  a  small  part  of  his  total
               scholarship,  they  certainly  offer  deep  insights  into  his  approach  to  sociological  research.  «His
               Gesammelte Schriften zur Religionssoziologie [Collected Writings on the Sociology of Religion…], edited
               and published in 1989 by Horst Jürgen Helle, do not count more than 140 pages and contain several
               speculative essays and paragraphs that go against the grain of empirical sociology as it is practised
               today. The most important text is beyond any doubt the lengthy essay “Die Religion” [Religion]
               (Simmel, 1989: 110-171). Actually, there are two versions of this score text, the original one published
               in 1906, and the expanded definitive version published in 1912 and written at the request of the famous
               Martin Buber» (LAERMANS, The ambivalence of religiosity and religion…, op. cit., 480).
                  48  LAERMANS, The ambivalence of religiosity and religion…, op. cit., 484.
                  49  ID.
                  50  SIMMEL, Gesammelte Schriften zur Religionssoziologie, op.cit, 125, as quoted by Laermans, The
               ambivalence of religiosity and religion…, op. cit., 484.

                                                   109
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20